During the July 22 work session of the Board of Trustees,
one trustee asked numerous questions about faculty extra service and expressed
concern that a faculty member had earned $77,000 per year in extra service pay.
As evidenced in Board meeting agendas and minutes going back to 2006, some
trustees have expressed concerns about inequity in faculty load and extra
service. In addition, the July 22 work session discussion was a continuation of
a conversation started during Spring 2016 in response to a request from Talent
Central to discuss equity in faculty load and extra service (which some faculty
took to be an effort to reduce the amount of extra service teaching that full
time faculty could perform).
Given the concerns raised at the July 22 Board work session,
the Faculty Council requested a special meeting with Chancellor May and Chief
Talent Officer Susan Hall on July 27, at which time we shared with the
Chancellor our perspectives on faculty extra service teaching, which affirm in
more detail our previously
articulated position of April 8, 2016 that the current guidelines for
full-time faculty teaching extra service are working well.
Each DCCCD college takes steps to ensure faculty who are
teaching extra service do not perform that extra service during designated
office hours or during hours when they perform their contractually obligated
institutional service. Some locations do not allow daytime extra service teaching
at all unless the dean, vice president, and president approve, and then only
when qualified adjuncts are not available to meet student demand for daytime
sections. In addition, any faculty teaching daytime extra service must keep an
updated schedule posted in the division office and outside his/her office door
to indicate when office hours are kept and institutional service is performed.
Rather than resort to policy changes, instructional leaders
throughout the District – including the faculty council and the academic vice
presidents – have reiterated that deans and faculty collaborating closely are
best able to determine the number of extra service sections an individual
faculty member successfully can teach. From a student learning and student
success perspective, current extra service practice – within existing policy –
is working well.
To respond to concerns expressed by the Board of Trustees on
July 22, Chancellor May asked the Faculty Council to convene a diverse group of
instructional leaders to study the equity of current practices in determining
faculty load across the District and to recommend solutions to situations where
inequity currently exists. The Council will recommend convening a task force
consisting of Council members, the academic vice presidents, and instructional
deans to discuss these issues and make recommendations. The group also will
call upon leaders of critical support functions, such as Susan Hall (who leads
Human Resources) and Chief Innovation Officer Tim Marshall (who leads District
IT, which runs our software infrastructure) to provide technical and
operational input, and the seven faculty members of the DCCFA Welfare and
Benefits committee (which is chaired by DCCFA Vice President Tommy Thompson).
No comments:
Post a Comment